Donors are not primarily motivated by taxes when they make their giving decisions. Rich, middle, or poor, we all have other considerations and motivations that trump the tax code’s financial incentives. This New York Times piece by Judith Warner, “The Charitable-Giving Divide” explores those greater influences.
I have always believed the Obama proposal to limit charitable deductions for high earners will not have the devastating impact on charitable giving that many predict. The decrease will be small and temporary.
History has shown that giving rebounds within a few years of depression, recession and tax code changes, then continues its gradual rise.
The Federal Trade Commission has a delightful new rule, the Red Flags Rule (link is to a 17 page .pdf from the FTC), which may draw your nonprofit into its regulatory web.
Your involuntary participation hinges on the law’s definition of “creditor” and the Red Flags Rule clearly announces that charities can fall within the law’s reach. This has me thinking about red flag football as a kid, when I was routinely forced into involuntary non-participation, after neither team picked me as a player. In an especially low point in my childhood, I was the football.
The Red Flags Rule compels organizations of all types to identify those business processes (red flags) that make them vulnerable to identity theft. Enforcement begins in December of this year.